Media Lens - the editors respond

From: "Editor"
Date: 28 April 2006 09:45:52 BDT
To: "Martin"
Subject: Re: Media Lens - not averse to a bit of censorship themselves...

Your email to us is noticeably different in tone to your posts, which were clearly intended to provoke and insult fellow posters. If you check the guidelines, you'll see that's something we don't tolerate. Our message board is for civil, rational debate.

The Editors


To which I've responded:


Hardly.

Your message board looks to be a place where a bunch of sycophants are busy ensuring that the debate doesn't really happen by constantly rehashing your mistaken position and spicing it up with some pathetic conspiracy theories and ad hominems about John Sloboda.

Direct criticism of your piss-poor position wasn't made to provoke *fellow posters* - it was made to point out that you have fucked up big time over this issue.

Gagging me because my inconvenient points were made forcefully is pathetic. Let me know your current position on this ASAP - as I've got plenty more to say on the issue.

I look forward to reading your response to the IBC rebuttal. If you need help with the maths let me know...

And let's see how many sentences you can write before you resort to Olly Kamm-style mentions of music lectureships etc.


Judge for yourselves about the nature of the Media Lens message board.